I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-305/10)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark DYNIQUE - Earlier Community word mark DIPTYQUE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 80/26
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Marlies Hartmann-Lamboy (Westerburg, Germany) (represented by: R. Loos, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by A. Pohlmann and subsequently by G. Schneider, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Diptyque SAS (Paris, France)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 May 2010 (Case R 1217/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Diptyque SAS and Ms Marlies Hartmann-Lamboy.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ms Marlies Hartmann-Lamboy to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.