I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark NAMMU - Relative ground for refusal - Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22(2) to (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))
(2015/C 034/43)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, T. Boddien, and M. Maier, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Vincci Hoteles SA (Alcobendas, Spain)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013 (Case R 611/2012-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Vincci Hoteles SA.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.