I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark TOYA - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/3900)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: Toya Development sp. z o.o. sp.k. (Kryniczno, Poland) (represented by: J. Sikocińska, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Jan Szmidt (Wrocław, Pologne) (represented by: T. Gawliczek, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 February 2024 (Case R 470/2023-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Toya Development sp. z o.o. sp.k. to pay the costs.
—
OJ C, C/2024/3479, 10.6.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3900/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—