- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-209/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 June 2008 — European Association of Im- and Exporters of Birds and live Animals and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Admissibility — Fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC — Natural and legal persons — Associations — Decision 2006/522/EC — Individual concern — Animal health — Protection measures in relation to avian influenza)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006TB0209
62006TB0209
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 197/23
(Case T-209/06)
(Action for annulment - Admissibility - Fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC - Natural and legal persons - Associations - Decision 2006/522/EC - Individual concern - Animal health - Protection measures in relation to avian influenza)
(2008/C 197/41)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicants: European Association of Im- and Exporters of Birds and live Animals (West Maas en Waal, Netherlands); Vereniging van Im- en Exporteurs van Vogels en Hobbydieren (West Maas en Waal, Netherlands); Willem Plomp, trading as Plomps Vogelhandel (Woerden, Netherlands); and Marinus Borgstein, trading as Borgstein Birds & Zoofood Trading (West Maas en Waal, Netherlands) (represented by: J. Wouters, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Erlbacher and M. van Heezik, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/522/EC of 25 July 2006 amending Decisions 2005/759/EC and 2005/760/EC as regards certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza and movements of certain live birds into the Community (OJ 2006 L 205, p. 28).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.The applicants shall pay the costs, including those relating to the application for interim measures.
* * *
(1) OJ C 249, 14.10.2006.