EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-105/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 June 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Freedom to provide services and free movement of capital — Articles 49 EC and 56 EC and Articles 36 and 40 of the EEA Agreement — Direct taxation — Taxation of interest received — Discriminatory treatment of non-residents — Burden of proof)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008CA0105

62008CA0105

June 17, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.8.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/2

(Case C-105/08) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Freedom to provide services and free movement of capital - Articles 49 EC and 56 EC and Articles 36 and 40 of the EEA Agreement - Direct taxation - Taxation of interest received - Discriminatory treatment of non-residents - Burden of proof)

2010/C 221/02

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and M. Afonso, Agents)

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, J. Menezes Leitão and C. Guerra Santos, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and V. Kazlauskaitė-Švenčionienė, Agents)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 49 EC and 56 EC — Difference in treatment of taxation of interest paid to financial institutions depending on whether they are resident or not in Portuguese territory

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

3.Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 116, 9.5.2008.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia