I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 302/80)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: VM Vermögens-Management GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde and P. Homann, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DAT Vermögensmanagement GmbH (Baldham, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Vermögensmanufaktur’ — Community trade mark No 8 770 042
Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 April 2015 in Case R 418/2014-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.