EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-214/15: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Município de Vila Pouca de Aguiar v Sá Machado & Filhos SA (Preliminary ruling — Public works contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 55 — Contract notice — Tender not accompanied by justification for abnormally low prices — Determination criteria — Article 7(c) — Value of the contract — Threshold not reached — Certain cross-border interest — Lack of information — Manifest inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CB0214

62015CB0214

July 7, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.9.2016

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/10

(Case C-214/15)

((Preliminary ruling - Public works contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 55 - Contract notice - Tender not accompanied by justification for abnormally low prices - Determination criteria - Article 7(c) - Value of the contract - Threshold not reached - Certain cross-border interest - Lack of information - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 343/14)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Município de Vila Pouca de Aguiar

Defendant: Sá Machado & Filhos SA

In the presence of: Norcep Construções e Empreendimentos Lda

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Supreme Administrative Court, Portugal), by decision of 9 April 2015, is manifestly inadmissible.

(1)

OJ C 254, 3.8.2015.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia