EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 5 February 1982. # Sven-Ole Mogensen and others v Commission of the European Communities. # Case 10/82 R.

ECLI:EU:C:1982:42

61982CO0010

February 5, 1982
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61982O0010

European Court reports 1982 Page 00325

Parties

IN CASE 10/82 R

SVEN-OLE MOGENSEN , CARL WALTENBURG , LENE OEHRGAARD AND JEAN-LOUIS DELVAUX , OFFICIALS OF THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY JYTTE THORBEK , OF THE COPENHAGEN BAR , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE CHAMBERS OF JACQUES LOESCH , 2 RUE GOETHE ,

APPLICANTS ,

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY JOHANNES F . BUHL , ITS LEGAL ADVISER , ACTING AS AGENT , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF ORESTE MONTALTO , JEAN MONNET BUILDING , KIRCHBERG ,

DEFENDANT ,

Subject of the case

APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES , NAMELY AN INJUNCTION PROHIBITING THE MAKING OF ANY APPOINTMENT TO THE POST OF REVISER DECLARED VACANT BY NOTICE NO COM/1144/80 UNTIL JUDGMENT IS GIVEN IN THE MAIN ACTION IN WHICH THE APPLICANTS HAVE CHALLENGED THE LAWFULNESS OF THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSION REJECTING THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR THE SAID POST ,

Grounds

1 A JUDGE BEFORE WHOM A REQUEST FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES IS BROUGHT , HAVING HEARD THE ARGUMENTS SET OUT BY THE PARTIES , MUST RESTRICT THE SCOPE OF HIS CONSIDERATION EXCLUSIVELY TO THE GROUNDS CAPABLE OF ESTABLISHING THE EXISTENCE OF URGENCY .

2 FROM THAT POINT OF VIEW IT MUST BE NOTED FIRST OF ALL THAT THE POST IN DISPUTE HAS ALREADY BEEN FILLED AND THAT , HAVING REGARD TO THE FACTS AT THE PRESENT TIME , THERE IS NO LONGER ANY REASON TO GRANT THE MEASURE REQUESTED .

3 ALTHOUGH THAT FINDING HAS NO EFFECT WHATEVER ON THE JUDGMENT TO BE GIVEN IN THE MAIN ACTION AND ON ANY CONSEQUENCES WHICH IT MAY HAVE , IT IS APPROPRIATE TO TAKE NOTE OF THE FACTUAL SITUATION AND TO DISMISS THIS APPLICATION SINCE IT IS NOW DEVOID OF PURPOSE .

Decision on costs

COSTS

4 IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE COSTS MUST BE RESERVED .

Operative part

ON THOSE GROUNDS ,

THE PRESIDENT OF THE THIRD CHAMBER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

BY WAY OF INTERLOCUTORY DECISION ,

HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :

1 . THE APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES IS DISMISSED .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia