I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 155/42)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Cecchi, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘WAVE TO PAY’ — Application for registration No 12 258 141
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 January 2015 in Case R 1864/2014-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009, and also that there were contradictions in the contested decision; and consequently
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-129/15.