I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
18.3.2024
(Case T-266/23) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark puma soundproofing - Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA - Relative ground for refusal - No injury to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2024/2040)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Puma Srl (Settimo Milanese, Italy) (represented by: E. La Malfa, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 February 2023 (Case R 1399/2021-1).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Puma SE shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Puma Srl.
3.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2040/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
(1) OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.