I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-255/20) (*)
(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Comitology - Technical Committee on Motor Vehicles - Agenda for the 79th meeting of the committee - Right to information applicable in the Member States of the European Union as regards emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 53/56)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: ClientEarth AISBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Logue, Solicitor, and J. Kenny, Barrister)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude, C. Ehrbar and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission of 26 February 2020 refusing to grant access to certain parts of the minutes of the 79th meeting of the Technical Committee on Motor Vehicles of 12 February 2019.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission shall pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.