EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-54/09: Action brought on 11 Februar 2009 — XXXLutzMarken v OHIM — Natura Selection (Linea Natura Natur hat immer Stil)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0054

62009TN0054

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

18.4.2009

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/30

(Case T-54/09)

2009/C 90/48

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: XXXLutzMarken (Wels, Austria) (represented by: H. Pannen, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Natura Selection SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 November 2008 in Case R 1787/2007-2;

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: XXXLutzMarken

Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark ‘LineaNatura Natur hat immer Stil’ for goods in Classes 8, 14, 16, 20, 21, 24, 25 and 27 (Registration No 4 626 693)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Natura Selection S.L.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark ‘natura selection’ (Community trade mark No 2 016 384) for goods and services in Classes 3, 14, 16, 20, 25, 35, 38, 39 and 42, and further Community trade marks and Spanish mark comprising the word ‘natura’, for goods and services in Classes 3, 14, 16, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27, 28, 35, 39 and 42

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upholding the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejection of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), since there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting marks

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/941 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia