I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Case C-897/24 P)
(C/2025/1531)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Boggio-Tomasaz and P. Mahnič, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Vladimir Gheorghe Plahotniuc
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the judgment under appeal;
—give final judgment in the matters that are the subject of this appeal and to dismiss Mr Plahotniuc action;
—order Mr Plahotniuc to bear the costs relating to the proceedings at first instance and to the appeal proceedings.
The appellant relies on two grounds of appeal.
First, error of law based on the misinterpretation of the listing grounds referred to in the statement of reasons in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1047 (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1045 (2).
Second, erroneous application of the Azarov case-law (3) as regards the obligation to state reasons and to verify the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.
—
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1047 of 30 May 2023 amending Decision (CFSP) 2023/891 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova (OJ 2023 L 140 I, p. 9).
(2) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1045 of 30 May 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/888 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova (OJ 2023 L 140 I, p. 1).
(3) Judgment of 19 December 2018, Azarov v Council, C-530/17 P, EU:C:2018:1031, and of 11 July 2019, Azarov v Council, C-416/18 P, not published, EU:C:2019:602.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1531/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—