- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-672/18: Action brought on 13 November 2018 — Pyke v EUIPO — Paglieri (CLIOMAKEUP)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0672
62018TN0672
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.1.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 25/50
(Case T-672/18)
(2019/C 25/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Pyke Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, F. Rossi, N. Parrotta and R. Perotti, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Paglieri SpA (Alessandria, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark CLIOMAKEUP — Application for registration No 11 698 446
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 August 2018 in Case R 2675/2017-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs;
—order Paglieri to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.