- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-483/24, ALDI: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 10 July 2024 – Procureur général près la Cour d’appel de Liège v Aldi SA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0483
62024CN0483
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5788
7.10.2024
(Case C-483/24, ALDI)
(C/2024/5788)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Procureur général près la Cour d’appel de Liège
Respondent: Aldi SA
Question referred
Do the obligations laid down in Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs, in Annex II thereto and, more specifically, in paragraph 2(c) of Chapter I, paragraph 1(a) of Chapter V, and paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of Chapter IX, impose on wholesale and retail food business operators an obligation as to the result to be achieved, such that the presence of droppings and traces of pests in shops and warehouses is sufficient, except in cases of force majeure, some external cause or unavoidable mistake, to establish an infringement of that regulation, or are food business operators subject only to an obligation to use best endeavours, that is to say to do everything possible to control pests, such that the mere finding by the national administrative authority of the presence of droppings and traces of pests in shops and warehouses is not sufficient to establish an infringement of that regulation?
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5788/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*
Language of the case: French.