EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-762/22: Action brought on 15 December 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Latvia

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0762

62022CN0762

December 15, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/15

(Case C-762/22)

(2023/C 54/18)

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Tricot and I. Rubene, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Latvia

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare that, by failing to adopt, by 6 February 2018 at the latest, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply fully with Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom, (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify those provisions to the Commission, the Republic of Latvia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 106 of that directive;

order the Republic of Latvia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In accordance with Article 106 of Directive 2013/59/Euratom, Member States were required to adopt and publish the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with that directive by 6 February 2018. The Member States were also required to inform the Commission of the text of the provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by that directive.

Since the Republic of Latvia has not adopted or, in any event, has not communicated to the Commission all the transposing measures necessary to comply with the directive, the Commission decided on 29 September to bring an action before the Court in order to obtain a declaration, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 258 TFEU, that the Republic of Latvia has not fulfilled its obligations under Article 106 of that directive.

(1) OJ 2014 L 13, p. 1.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia