I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 61/21
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: O. Bludovsky and C. Mellein, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Diseños Mireia, SL (Barcelona, Spain)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 911/2012-1 and cancel the contested trade mark;
—Alternatively: Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 911/2012-1 and remit the case;
—Alternatively: Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 September 2013 given in Case R 911/2012-1.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark consisting of the letters ‘D’ and ‘M’ for goods in Class 14 — Community trade mark application No 9 737 917
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: The Community trade mark registration No 3 984 044 for the word mark ‘dm’ for goods in Class 14
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1) (b) CTMR