I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative mark milko ΔΕΛΤΑ – Earlier Community figurative mark MILKA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 28, 48-50)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 June 2006 (Case R 540/2005-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG and Delta Protypos Viomichania Galaktos AE.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Vivartia ABEE Proïonton Diatrofis kai Ypiresion Estiasis, formerly Delta Protypos Viomichania Galaktos AE
Community trade mark sought:
Figurative mark milko ΔΕΛΤΑ for goods in Class 30 – Application No 2474674
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Community, international and national figurative marks and word marks MILKA for goods in classes 5, 29, 30 and 32
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders Vivartia ABEE Proïonton Diatrofis kai Ypiresion Estiasis to pay the costs.