- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-353/21: Action brought on 25 June 2021 — KTM Fahrrad v EUIPO — KTM (R2R)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0353
62021TN0353
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.8.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/52
(Case T-353/21)
(2021/C 320/58)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: KTM Fahrrad GmbH (Mattighofen, Austria) (represented by: V. Hoene, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: KTM AG (Mattighofen, Austria)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark R2R — European Union trade mark No 17 886 364
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2021 in Case R 261/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul cancellation decision No 22964C of the Cancellation Division of 4 December 2019 and the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 20 April 2021 upholding it, including as regards the costs, and reject the application for cancellation of the respondent [before the Board of Appeal];
—in the alternative, annul cancellation decision No 22964C of the Cancellation Division of 4 December 2019 and the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 20 April 2021 upholding it, including as regards the costs, and reject the application for cancellation of the respondent [before the Board of Appeal], so far as concerns vehicles and vehicle parts, included in Class 12 — namely, land vehicles and vehicle parts for them;
—in the further alternative, annul cancellation decision No 22964C of the Cancellation Division of 4 December 2019 and the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 20 April 2021 upholding it, including as regards the costs, and reject the application for cancellation of the respondent [before the Board of Appeal], so far as concerns vehicles and vehicle parts, included in Class 12, namely, bicycles and two-wheeled vehicles and vehicle parts for them.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 58 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.