- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-67/20: Action brought on 3 February 2020 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ NEW YORK)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0067
62020TN0067
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.3.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 95/44
(Case T-67/20)
(2020/C 95/53)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hauz 1929 Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Lyberis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Houzz, Inc. (Palo Alto, California, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark HAUZ NEW YORK — Application for registration No 17 593 807
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2019 in Case R 886/2019-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—partially annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the applicant in the present proceedings, including those incurred before EUIPO.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.