- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-296/22: Action brought on 20 May 2022 — Flowbird v EUIPO — Apcoa Parking Holdings (FLOWBIRD)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0296
62022TN0296
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.7.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 276/13
(Case T-296/22)
(2022/C 276/19)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Flowbird (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: C. Pecnard, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apcoa Parking Holdings GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark FLOWBIRD — International registration designating the European Union No 1 478 123
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2022 in Case R 748/2021-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court;
—order Apcoa Parking Holdings to pay the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.