- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 December 2010. # Dimitris Platis v Council of the European Union and Hellenic Republic. # Appeal - Action for annulment - Council regulations laying down provisions on the introduction of the euro - National legislative measures laying down provisions to implement those regulations - Manifest inadmissibility of the action - General Court’s manifest lack of jurisdiction - Appeal in part clearly unfounded and in part clearly inadmissible - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure. # Case C-513/10 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2010:797
62010CO0513
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C‑513/10 P)
Appeal – Action for annulment – Council regulations laying down provisions on the introduction of the euro – National legislative measures laying down provisions to implement those regulations – Manifest inadmissibility of the action – General Court’s manifest lack of jurisdiction – Appeal in part clearly unfounded and in part clearly inadmissible – Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure
Re:
Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2010 in Case T‑311/10 Platis v Council and Greece whereby the General Court dismissed an action seeking annulment of several Council regulations adopted in 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 laying down provisions on the introduction of the euro, on unit values and technical specifications of euro coins to enter circulation, and on conversion rates between the euro and the currencies of Member States adopting the euro, and the annulment of the national laws 2842/2000 and 2948/2001 transposing the contested regulations into the Greek legal order – Clearly inadmissible – Clear lack of jurisdiction.
Operative part
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Mr Platis is ordered to bear his own costs.