I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Officials – Disciplinary measures – Relegation in step – Articles 11 and 14 of the Staff Regulations – Contract for the security of the Commission’s buildings)
Full text in French II - 0000
Application: for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 25 June 2001 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 13 March 2001 whereby he contested the decision adopted by the appointing authority on 19 December 2000 imposing on the applicant the disciplinary measure of relegation by two steps.
Held: The decision of 19 December 2000 imposing on the applicant the disciplinary penalty of reduction by two steps is annulled. The Commission is ordered to pay the costs.
(Staff Regulations, Arts 90 and 91)
(Staff Regulations, Art. 11)
(see para. 30)
See: 293/87 Vainker v Parliament [1989] ECR 23, para. 8; T-33/91 Williams v Court of Auditors [1992] ECR II-2499, para. 23; T-36/94 Capitanio v Commission [1996] ECR-SC I-A-449 and II-1279, para. 33
(see para. 47)