EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-761/20: Action brought on 20 December 2020 — European Dynamics Luxembourg v ECB

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0761

62020TN0761

December 20, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/33

(Case T-761/20)

(2021/C 88/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Sfyri, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the ECB to exclude the applicant’s tenders from all three lots of the procurement procedure ‘Provision of services and works for IT Application Delivery’ PRO-004801 (Lot 1), PRO-005110 (Lot 2) and PRO-005112 (Lot 3);

annul the appeal decision of the ECB Procurement Review Body to reject the applicant’s appeal submitted in accordance with the appeal procedure as defined in section VI.4 of the tender specifications of the abovementioned call for tenders and under the conditions set out in Article 39 of the ECB Procurement Decision (ECB/2016/2);

annul all the subsequent related decisions of the ECB and in particular any award decision which was never communicated to the applicant;

award damages according to Articles 256, 268 and 340 TFEU corresponding to the loss of the chance to secure the contracts or to the loss of income corresponding to the profit that the applicant would have made if it had performed the contracts and to the compensation corresponding to the non-material damages;

order the defendant to pay the applicant’s legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant made several manifest errors of assessment.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant introduced new, vague and unknown criteria at the stage of the evaluation of the offers.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant misused its powers.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia