I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-70/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU - Setting of fees by the Split Port Authority for port services in respect of domestic traffic at maximum levels - Rejection of a complaint - Case being dealt with by a competition authority of a Member State - No EU interest))
(2016/C 419/47)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Trajektna luka Split d.d. (Split, Croatia) (represented by: M. Bauer, H.-J. Freund and S. Hankiewicz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, C. Urraca Caviedes and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents)
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 9236 final of 28 November 2014, rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant concerning infringements of Article 102 TFEU allegedly committed by the Split Port Authority or of Articles 102 and 106 TFEU committed by the Republic of Croatia or the Split Port Authority (Case AT.40199 — Port of Split).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Trajektna luka Split d.d. to pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.