EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-389/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 July 2016 by BSH Hausgeräte GmbH, anciennement BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 May 2016 in Case T-749/14: Chung-Yuan Chang v EUIPO — BSH Hausgeräte (AROMA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0389
62016CN0389
July 12, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.3.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 78/6
(Case C-389/16 P)
(2017/C 078/09)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: BSH Hausgeräte GmbH, anciennement BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (represented by: S. Biagosch, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Peter Chung-Yuan Chang
By order of 15 November 2016 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.