- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-238/24: Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Karić v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0238
62024TN0238
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/3792
(Case T-238/24)
(C/2024/3792)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Bogoljub Karić (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: W. Julié and A. Beauchemin, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/769 of 26 February 2024 (1), insofar as it maintains the name of the Applicant in Annex I to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine;
—annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/768 of 26 February 2024 (2), insofar as it maintains the Applicant’s name in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine;
—order the Council of the European Union to bear the full costs and expenses of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging violation of the right to effective judicial protection and the obligation to state reasons.
2.Second plea in law, alleging the errors of assessment.
—
(1) OJ L, 2024/769, 27.2.2024.
(2) OJ L, 2024/768, 27.2.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3792/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—