I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-520/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(State aid - Public service broadcasting - Aid intended to be granted by the French Republic to France Télévisions - Budgetary grant for 2009 - Decision not to raise objections - Service of general economic interest - Criterion of proportionality - No serious difficulties)
2012/C 250/21
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Télévision française 1 (TF1) (Boulogne-Billancourt, France); Métropole télévision (M6) (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France); and Canal + (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) (represented by: J.P. Hordies and C. Smits, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J. Gstalter, acting as Agents); and France Télévisions (Paris, France) (represented by: J.P. Gunther and A. Giraud, lawyers)
Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 1 September 2009 concerning a budgetary grant in favour of France Télévisions in so far as the Commission raises no objections in that decision regarding a budgetary grant of a maximum amount of EUR 450 million for 2009.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action as unfounded;
2.Orders Télévision française 1 (TF1), Métropole télévision (M6) and Canal + to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and France Télévisions;
3.Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.