- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-528/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2024 – Belaruskali v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Support for the regime – Financial support – State-owned undertaking – Benefitting from the regime – Repression of civil society – Error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0528
62022TA0528
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/6427
(Case T-528/22)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list - Support for the regime - Financial support - State-owned undertaking - Benefitting from the regime - Repression of civil society - Error of assessment)
(C/2024/6427)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Belaruskali AAT (Soligorsk, Belarus) (represented by: V. Ostrovskis and E. Anevlavi, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Rurarz, B. Driessen and A. Boggio-Tomasaz, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet, L. Van den Broeck and M. Van Regemorter, acting as Agents), Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere and J. Davidoviča, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of (i) Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881 of 3 June 2022 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 77) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876 of 3 June 2022 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 1), and (ii) Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 amending Decision 2012/642 (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 41) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 20), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Belaruskali AAT to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the application for interim measures;
3.Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Latvia each to bear their own costs.
*
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6427/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
* * *