I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2022/C 284/68)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: PF (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present action admissible and well founded;
and consequently,
—annul the decision of 18 February 2022 rejecting the applicant’s request for review of the decision of the selection board for competition PE/AD/260/2021 of 20 December 2021 not to admit her to the oral tests and, in so far as necessary, annul the decision of 20 December 2021;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging breach of the obligation to state reasons.
2.Second plea in law, alleging breach of the rules governing the proceedings of the selection board and the principles of impartiality and non-discrimination.