EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-166/08: Action brought on 6 May 2008 — Ivanov v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0166

62008TN0166

May 6, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/23

(Case T-166/08)

(2008/C 183/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Vladimir Ivanov (Boulogne Billancourt, France) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Declare that the Commission is liable for infringement of the principles of transparency, proper administration, non-discrimination and equal treatment in connection with the recruitment procedure which took place following the vacancy notice for a post as a ‘Pre-enlargement Adviser and Political Rapporteur’ based in Sofia, in May 2003;

Order the Commission to make good, on the basis of the second paragraph of Article 288 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the damage which it caused to the applicant;

Accordingly, order the Commission to pay to the applicant the amount of EUR 180 000 as damages for the loss sustained;

Order the Commission to pay the amount of EUR 10 000 in respect of non-material damage sustained by the applicant;

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs and expenses.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In 2003, the applicant applied for a local member of staff's post as a ‘Pre-enlargement Adviser’ in Sofia. His application was rejected at the preliminary selection stage on account of his dual Franco-Bulgarian nationality as only candidates who had the nationality of a Member State were eligible for the vacant post.

During the recruitment procedure and after the rejection of his application, the applicant unsuccessfully requested more information regarding the procedure and the reasons for the rejection of his application. He then brought the matter before the European Ombudsman, who concluded that there had been maladministration and infringement of the principle of non-discrimination or of equal treatment on the part of the Commission.

By the present action, the applicant requests that the Court of First Instance declare that the Commission is non-contractually liable for infringement of the principles of transparency, proper administration, non-discrimination and equal treatment in connection with the recruitment procedure in question.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia