- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-666/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2013 — Rohm Semiconductor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0666
62013CN0666
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.3.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 85/12
(Case C-666/13)
2014/C 85/22
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Rohm Semiconductor GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Krefeld
(<span class="super">1</span>)Questions referred
1.Does the fact that goods have an individual function within the meaning of heading 8543 of the Combined Nomenclature mean that they may not be classified in heading 8541, despite their assembly?
2.If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: In what circumstances are transmitter/receiver modules of the type described in more detail in the grounds, which have an individual function within the meaning of heading 8543, to be regarded as parts of machines or apparatus in heading 8543?
Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1832/2002 of 1 August 2002, amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2002 L 290, p. 1).