EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-368/25: Action brought on 5 June 2025 – Engie and Electrabel v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0368

62025TN0368

June 5, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/4062

28.7.2025

(Case T-368/25)

(C/2025/4062)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Engie (Courbevoie, France), Electrabel SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Tayar and A. Gosset-Grainville, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Forms of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

annul Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/477 pursuant to Article 263 TFEU in so far as it concludes that Engie is a contracting entity within the meaning of Directive 2014/25/EU;

annul Articles 1 and 2 of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/477 in so far as they concern Engie; and

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging the lack of competence of the European Commission.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements relating to the infringement of the fundamental right to be heard.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements relating to the infringement of the obligation to state reasons and infringement of the duty of care.

Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements relating to the infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2) of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4062/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia