I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2025/4062)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Engie (Courbevoie, France), Electrabel SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Tayar and A. Gosset-Grainville, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/477 pursuant to Article 263 TFEU in so far as it concludes that Engie is a contracting entity within the meaning of Directive 2014/25/EU;
—annul Articles 1 and 2 of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/477 in so far as they concern Engie; and
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law.
First plea in law, alleging the lack of competence of the European Commission.
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements relating to the infringement of the fundamental right to be heard.
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements relating to the infringement of the obligation to state reasons and infringement of the duty of care.
Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements relating to the infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.
Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2) of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4062/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—