EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-74/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2008 — Longinidis v Cedefop (Staff case — Members of the temporary staff — Reassignment — Appeals Committee — Composition and internal rules of procedure — Unfair behaviour — Dismissal — Statement of reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006FA0074

62006FA0074

January 1, 2006
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Tenth Chamber)

15.8.2008

C 209/70

(Case F-74/06)

(Staff case - Members of the temporary staff - Reassignment - Appeals Committee - Composition and internal rules of procedure - Unfair behaviour - Dismissal - Statement of reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers)

(2008/C 209/127)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Pavlos Longinidis (Panorama, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (represented by: M. Fuchs, Agent, and P. Anestis, lawyer)

Re:

First, annulment of the decision of the Directorate of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 30 November 2005 terminating the applicant's indefinite term contract along with a series of decisions concerning inter alia Cedefop's Appeals Committee and, second, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses the action as partly inadmissible and partly unfounded;

2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.

* * *

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 15.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia