- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-670/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 10 September 2019 — Gardinia Home Decor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Ulm
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0670
62019CN0670
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.5.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 161/14
(Case C-670/19)
(2020/C 161/21)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Gardinia Home Decor GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Ulm
By order of 27 February 2020, the Court (Sixth Chamber) ruled as follows:
The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (1) as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 861/2010 of 5 October 2010, (2) is to be interpreted as meaning that base metal curtain rods fall within tariff subheading 8302 41 90, unless those rods consist of rods, tubes or bars which have been merely cut to the required length, which is for the referring court to ascertain in order to carry out its own tariff classification of the goods at issue in the main proceedings, having regard to the information provided by the Court in response to the first question referred.
(1) OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.
(2) Regulation amending Annex I of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2010 L 284, p. 1).