I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2020/C 339/32)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) (Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary) (represented by: V. Luszcz, C. Sár and É. Ulviczki, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Qx World Kft. (Budapest, Hungary)
Applicant of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark QUEST 9 — Application for registration No 17 885 953
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 June 2020 in Case R 1900/2019-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the applicant incurred in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
—should there be an intervention, to order the intervener to bear the costs of the applicant incurred in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 97 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of essential procedural requirements;
—Infringement of the duty to provide adequate reasons.