- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-132/15: Judgment of the General Court of 14 March 2017 — IR v EUIPO — Pirelli Tyre (popchrono) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark popchrono — Absence of genuine use of a trade mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0132
62015TA0132
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.5.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 144/34
(Case T-132/15) (1)
((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark popchrono - Absence of genuine use of a trade mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 144/45)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: IR (represented by: C. de Marguerye, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by S. Palmero Cabezas, and subsequently by D. Gája, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pirelli Tyre SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: T. Malte Müller and F. Togo, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 February 2015 (Case R 217/2014-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Pirelli Tyre and Mr IR.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr IR to pay the costs.
OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.