- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 1 June 1999. # Karl L. Meyer v Council of the European Union. # Manifest inadmissibility. # Case T-74/99.
ECLI:EU:T:1999:117
61999TO0074
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
61999B0074
European Court reports 1999 Page II-01749
Keywords
Actions for annulment - Time-limits - Time-barred (EC Treaty, Art. 173, fifth para. (now, after amendment, Art. 230, fifth para., EC)
Summary
$The time-limit for bringing proceedings provided for in the fifth paragraph of Article 173 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 230, fifth paragraph, EC) is designed to ensure not only that the applicant has a reasonable amount of time in which to assess whether there exist grounds for contesting a measure and, if so, to prepare his application, but also that a measure cannot be the subject of an application for annulment after a certain time has elapsed. Only by means of the strict application of the time-limit thus prescribed is it possible to fulfil the requirements of legal certainty and the need to avoid any discrimination or arbitrary treatment in the administration of justice.