- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-472/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — BASF v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use containing omega-3 acid ethyl esters — Variation of the terms of the authorisation — First paragraph of Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0472
62019TA0472
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 390/32
(Case T-472/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Medicinal products for human use - Marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use containing omega-3 acid ethyl esters - Variation of the terms of the authorisation - First paragraph of Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality)
(2020/C 390/45)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: BASF AS (Oslo, Norway) (represented by: E. Wright, Barrister, and H. Boland, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2019) 4336 final of 6 June 2019 concerning, in the framework of Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, marketing authorisations of medicinal products for human use containing ‘Omega-3 acid ethyl esters’ for oral use in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders BASF AS to pay the costs, including the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 305, 9.9.2019.
* * *
Language of the case: English