- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-469/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information Society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 2(a) — Reproduction right — Article 3(1) — Communication to the public — Article 5(2) and (3) — Exceptions and limitations — Scope — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CA0469
62017CA0469
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.9.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 319/5
(Case C-469/17)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Copyright and related rights - Directive 2001/29/EC - Information Society - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights - Article 2(a) - Reproduction right - Article 3(1) - Communication to the public - Article 5(2) and (3) - Exceptions and limitations - Scope - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
(2019/C 319/04)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant and appellant: Funke Medien NRW GmbH
Applicant and respondent: Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 2(a) and Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as constituting measures of full harmonisation of the scope of the exceptions or limitations which they contain. Article 5(3)(c), second case, and (d) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted as not constituting measures of full harmonisation of the scope of the relevant exceptions or limitations.
2.Freedom of information and freedom of the press, enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, are not capable of justifying, beyond the exceptions or limitations provided for in Article 5(2) and (3) of Directive 2001/29, a derogation from the author’s exclusive rights of reproduction and of communication to the public, referred to in Article 2(a) and Article 3(1) of that directive respectively.
3.In striking the balance which is incumbent on a national court between the exclusive rights of the author referred to in Article 2(a) and in Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 on the one hand, and, on the other, the rights of the users of protected subject matter referred to in Article 5(3)(c), second case, and (d) of that directive, the latter of which derogate from the former, a national court must, having regard to all the circumstances of the case before it, rely on an interpretation of those provisions which, whilst consistent with their wording and safeguarding their effectiveness, fully adheres to the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
(1) OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.