I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeal – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court to examine an action seeking annulment of decisions of national courts, compensation for damage caused by national authorities and a declaration that those authorities have failed to act – Appeal manifestly unfounded
Procedure – Action brought by a natural or legal person for annulment of decisions of national courts, compensation for damage caused by national authorities and a declaration that those authorities have failed to act – Community judicature manifestly lacking jurisdiction (Art. 225 EC et seq. and Art. 140a EA et seq.; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 51; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 119) (see paras 7-9, 12)
Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 22 July 2009 in Case T-234/09 Hârsulescu v Romania in which the Court of First Instance held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the applicant’s action for the annulment of two judgments given by national courts and for damages – Challenge to the method of calculating retirement pension rights – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court.
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Mr Hârsulescu is ordered to pay the costs.