I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
9.9.2024
(C/2024/5310)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Sofiyska gradska prokuratura
Can the obligation relating to recognition under Article 6 of Framework Decision 2005/214, the power to consult under Article 7(3) of that decision, and the principle of preventing impunity, be interpreted as conferring on the executing authority, where it has established that there is an optional ground for refusal under Article 7(2)(g)(i) of that decision, the power to:
1.consult the issuing authority in accordance with Article 7(3) of the Framework Decision to determine whether the penalised person has a current possibility of raising an objection to the decision imposing a financial penalty;
2.if the answer is in the affirmative, serve the decision imposing a financial penalty on the penalised person and inform him or her of the right to object;
3.await the outcome of any objection and take it into account in its decision as to the merits [?]
—
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties (OJ 2005 L 76, p. 16).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5310/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—