I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 338/58)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Freistaat Bayern (represented by: M. Müller, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BSGE Bundesverband Souvenir Geschenke Ehrenpreise eV (Veitsbronn, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Neuschwanstein’ — EU trade mark No 15 687 353
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2023 in Case R 1013/2021-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.