I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 172/57)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Aurea Biolabs Pte Ltd (Cochin, India) (represented by: B. Brandreth, QC and L. Oommen, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Avizel SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for figurative mark AUREA BIOLABS — Application for registration No 15 836 737
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2019 in Case R 814/2018-2 (CORR)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the payment of the Applicant’s costs.
—In support of its decision, the Board of Appeal relies on an invalid provision of law;
—Had there been an obvious error of law, the appropriate course was to revoke the previous decision;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of the principles of natural justice.