EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases C-441/22 and C-443/22, Obshtina Razgrad and Others: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 December 2023 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — Zamestnik-ministar na regionalnoto razvitie i blagoustroystvoto i rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Regioni v rastezh’ 2014-2020 (C-441/22), Zamestnik-ministar na regionalnoto razvitie i blаgoustroystvoto i rakovoditel na Natsionalnia organ po Programa INTERREG V-A Rumania-Bulgaria 2014-2020 (C-443/22) v Obshtina Razgrad (C-441/22), Obshtina Balchik (C-443/22) (References for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — European Structural and Investment Funds — Contract performance — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 72 — Modification of contracts during their term — Modification of the time limit for performance — Substantial modification — Unforeseeable circumstances)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0441

62022CA0441

December 7, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/922

29.1.2024

(Joined Cases C-441/22 and C-443/22, (Obshtina Razgrad and Others)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - European Structural and Investment Funds - Contract performance - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 72 - Modification of contracts during their term - Modification of the time limit for performance - Substantial modification - Unforeseeable circumstances)

(C/2024/922)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants in cassation: Zamestnik-ministar na regionalnoto razvitie i blagoustroystvoto i rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Regioni v rastezh’ 2014-2020 (C-441/22), Zamestnik-ministar na regionalnoto razvitie i blаgoustroystvoto i rakovoditel na Natsionalnia organ po Programa INTERREG V-A Rumania-Bulgaria 2014-2020 (C-443/22)

Respondents in cassation: Obshtina Razgrad (C-441/22), Obshtina Balchik (C-443/22)

With the participation of: Varhovna administrativna prokuratura

Operative part of the judgment

1.Article 72(1)(e) and Article 72(4) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2365 of 18 December 2017, must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purpose of classifying a modification of a public procurement contract as ‘substantial’ within the meaning of that article, the parties to the contract need not have signed a written agreement having that modification as its object, as a common intention to make the modification at issue may also be inferred from, inter alia, other written material originating from those parties.

2.Article 72(1)(c)(i) of Directive 2014/24, as amended by Delegated Regulation 2017/2365, must be interpreted as meaning that the diligence which the contracting authority needs to have shown in order to be able to rely on that provision requires, in particular, that contracting authority to have taken into account, during the preparation of the public contract concerned, the risks of the time limit for performance of that contract being exceeded resulting from foreseeable causes of suspension, such as ordinary weather conditions and statutory prohibitions on the performance of works published in advance and applicable during a period included in the period for performance of that contract, as such weather conditions and statutory prohibitions cannot, where they have not been provided for in the documents governing the public contract award procedure, justify the performance of the works beyond the time limit set in those documents and in the initial public procurement contract.

(1) Language of the case: Bulgarian.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/922/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: Bulgarian

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia