- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-406/16: Action brought on 22 July 2016 — Dogg Label v EUIPO — Chemoul (JAPRAG)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0406
62016TN0406
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.10.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 364/17
(Case T-406/16)
(2016/C 364/14)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Parties
Applicant: Dogg Label (Marseille, France) (represented by: M. Angelier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party before the Board of Appeal: Patrick Chemoul (Paris, France)
Details of the procedure before EUIPO
Proprietor of the mark at issue: the other party before the Board of Appeal
Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘JAPRAG’ — EU trade mark No 8 820 301
Proceedings before EUIPO: invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 May 2016 in Case R 2336/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the contested decision;
—order the European Union Intellectual Property Office to assent to the action for annulment brought by the company DOGG LABEL;
—declare invalid the Community trade mark ‘JAPRAG’ No 8 820 301 for all the goods in Classes 18 and 25, on the basis of Article 53(1)(a) of the EU trade mark regulation in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of that regulation.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.