- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 October 2017.#Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission.#Rectification.#Case T-119/10 REC.
ECLI:EU:T:2017:763
62010TO0119(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27 October 2017 (*1)
(Rectification)
In Case T‑119/10,
Kingdom of the Netherlands, represented initially by Y. de Vries, J. Langer and C. Wissels, and subsequently by J. Langer and M. Bulterman and B. Koopman, acting as Agents,
applicant,
supported by
Kingdom of Belgium, represented initially by M. Jacobs and T. Materne, and subsequently by M. Jacobs and J.-C. Halleux, acting as Agents,
and by
French Republic, represented initially by G. de Bergues and B. Messmer, and subsequently by J. Bousin and D. Colas, acting as Agents,
interveners,
European Commission, represented by W. Roels and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents,
defendant,
APPLICATION pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10712 of 23 December 2009 on the reduction in the financial assistance granted to the Rhine-Meuse flood protection programme under Community initiative programme Interreg II/C in the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) pursuant to Commission Decision C(97) 3742 of 18 December 1997 (ERDF No 970010008),
THE GENERAL COURT (Fifth Chamber),
composed of D. Gratsias, President, I. Labucka (Rapporteur) and I. Ulloa Rubio, Judges,
Registrar: E. Coulon,
makes the following
1On 13 September 2017, the General Court delivered the order in, Netherlands v Commission (T‑119/10, EU:T:2017:622).
2By letter received at the Registry of the General Court on 15 September 2017, the defendant requested the Court to correct a clerical error in the names of the Agents of the Commission in the introductory part of that order.
3In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, it is necessary to rectify a clerical error in the introductory part of the order in the name of one of the Agents of the European Commission.
On those grounds,
hereby orders:
The introductive part of the order of 13 September 2017 should read ‘European Commission, represented by W. Roels and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents’ instead of ‘European Commission, represented by R. Wim and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents’.
Luxembourg, 27 October 2017.
Registrar
President
*1 Language of the case: Dutch.