I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Case T-346/23)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark FINASTRA - Earlier Benelux word mark FENESTRAE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/73)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Finastra International Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fenestrae BV (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Hoogcarspel and J. van den Berg, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 April 2023 (Case R 1296/2022-1).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Finastra International Ltd, in addition to bearing its own costs, shall pay those incurred by Fenestrae BV.
3.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
* * *
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/73/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—