- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-668/19: Action brought on 1 October 2019 — Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings v EUIPO (sound mark)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0668
62019TN0668
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.11.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 399/93
(Case T-668/19)
(2019/C 399/112)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co. KG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: S. Abrar, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for an EU sound mark — Registration No 17 912 475
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2019 in Case R 530/2019-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Distortion of facts (breach of Article 72(2) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council);
—Infringement of the duty to state reasons (Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council);
—Failure to have regard to the relevant case-law;
—Breach of Article 72(2) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Breach of Article 72(2) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Non-observance of the right to be heard (Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.