- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-138/17: Action brought on 28 February 2017 — Prim v EUIPO — Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0138
62017TN0138
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.4.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 129/29
(Case T-138/17)
(2017/C 129/44)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Prim, SA (Móstoles, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik GmbH (Halberstadt, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘PRIMED’ No 5 154 182
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2016 in Joined Cases R 2494/2015-4 and R 163/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.